TH16504
Detected presence of package manifests that execute code written in another programming language.
| priority | CI/CD status | severity | effort | SAFE level | SAFE assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pass | medium | high | None | None |
About the issueโ
Many popular programming languages use standardized software packaging formats to distribute reusable code components. Software packages are built from instructions written within package manifests that act as blueprints for package assembly. A package manifest declares the most important software properties, such as the package name, its authors and license, external dependencies, and various actions that may occur during the package lifecycle. Actions defined within the package manifest are executed automatically by the package manager during events such as package installation, compilation, testing, or on package removal. It is unusual to have a package manifest that executes actions using programming languages that are not native to the package ecosystem. Attackers often reuse code across ecosystems, targeting developers that have multiple languages installed on their machines. This is a simple but effective way to avoid detection by security solutions.
How to resolve the issueโ
- Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.
- Consider rewriting the package manifest without using multiple programming languages.
Incidence statisticsโ
ReversingLabs periodically collects and analyzes the contents of popular software package repositories for threat research purposes. Analysis results are used to calculate incidence statistics for issues (policy violations) that Spectra Assure can detect in software packages.
This section is updated when new data becomes available.
Total amount of packages analyzed
- RubyGems: 203K
- Nuget: 735K
- PyPi: 838K
- NPM: 5.12M
- VS Code: 113K
- PS Gallery: 17K
Total detections per repository
For every repository, the chart shows the number of packages that triggered the software assurance policy. In other words, it shows how many packages in each package repository were found to have the specific issue described on this page. This information helps you understand how common the issue is across different software communities.
If a repository is absent from the chart, that means none of the packages in that repository triggered this policy during analysis, or the policy was not used during analysis.
Distribution of total detections by project popularity
For every repository, the chart shows how many of the total detections belong to the Top 100 (1-100), Top 1000 (101-1000) and Top 10 000 (1001-10 000) most downloaded projects. This information helps you understand the impact of the issue within each community, making it clearer when the issue affects the most popular projects.
If the chart shows zero values for all of the top project groups, that means all detections were in unranked projects (lower than 10 000 on the list of most downloaded projects).
Recommended readingโ
- Understanding Code-Reuse Attacks and Reducing Attack Surface (External resource - Medium)