Skip to main content

TH16116

Detected presence of software components that can bypass system security software.

priorityCI/CD statusseverityeffortSAFE levelSAFE assessment
passhighhighNoneNone

About the issueโ€‹

Software components sometimes need to interact with higher privilege parts of the operating system, often requiring administrative access to accomplish a task. Operating systems integrate first and third-party security solutions that can detect and block malicious code. For that reason, attackers often aim to bypass system security software. Disabling antivirus and other security software services enables malicious code to execute without being blocked. While the presence of code that interacts with system security software does not necessarily imply malicious intent, all of its uses in a software package should be documented and approved. Only select applications should consider using functions that can disable system security software. One example of acceptable use for such functions is allowing specialized applications to modify protected folders and settings.

How to resolve the issueโ€‹

  • Investigate reported detections as indicators of software tampering.
  • Consult Mitre ATT&CK documentation: T1562.001 - Disable or Modify Tools.
  • Consider rewriting the flagged code without using the marked behaviors.

Incidence statisticsโ€‹

ReversingLabs periodically collects and analyzes the contents of popular software package repositories for threat research purposes. Analysis results are used to calculate incidence statistics for issues (policy violations) that Spectra Assure can detect in software packages.

This section is updated when new data becomes available.

Total amount of packages analyzed

  • RubyGems: 183K
  • Nuget: 644K
  • PyPi: 628K
  • NPM: 3.72M

Total detections per repository

For every repository, the chart shows the number of packages that triggered the software assurance policy. In other words, it shows how many packages in each package repository were found to have the specific issue described on this page. This information helps you understand how common the issue is across different software communities.

If a repository is absent from the chart, that means none of the packages in that repository triggered this policy during analysis, or the policy was not used during analysis.

Distribution of total detections by project popularity

For every repository, the chart shows how many of the total detections belong to the Top 100 (1-100), Top 1000 (101-1000) and Top 10 000 (1001-10 000) most downloaded projects. This information helps you understand the impact of the issue within each community, making it clearer when the issue affects the most popular projects.

If the chart shows zero values for all of the top project groups, that means all detections were in unranked projects (lower than 10 000 on the list of most downloaded projects).